Coordinating Research and evidence for Medical Devices (CORE MD) and beyond
Abstract
Medical device regulations have its focal center on translating expert knowledge into advice for EU regulatory guidance, and building expertise in regulatory science in the clinical community, the Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices (CORE MD) project is here to review methodologies for the clinical evaluation of high-risk medical devices and recommend new designs to set an appropriate balance between innovation, safety, and clinical effectiveness. CORE-MD is a European Union Horizon 2020 project which began in April 2021 and was concluded in March 2024. For the first time ever CORE–MD consortium stands to bring together 33 medical associations, on one platform. The major objective of CORE MD is, developing guidance for evaluation of artificial intelligence. CORE MD includes cardiovascular, and diabetes medical devices, since these exemplify devices are used to reduce mortality and morbidity, the use of real-world evidence in regulatory decision making, evidences from clinical trials on High-risk medical devices, establishment of post approval evidence development schemes, tools to retrieve public information on medical devices and information on the performance of these High-Risk Medical Devices. As a result, the need for more sources to provide clinical evidences for medical devices is required, before they are approved for implantation in patients and to add on the focus, CORE MD project has brought brilliant potential in increasing the use of benefit measures and accelerating surrogate outcomes research which would optimize an implant’s benefit-risk ratio and making CORE-MD an ambitious project with great scope.
Downloads
References
https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70178-5
2. Mcgovern L, Siontis G, Coughlan JJ, Melvin T, Geertsma R, Frenk A, Schnell-Inderst P, McGauran G, Fraser AG, Windecker S, Byrne RA. 27 A Systematic review of the evidence supporting the use of surgical aortic and mitral valves: an update from the core MD consortium. Heart [Internet]. 2023 Oct 01[cited 2024 Oct 01]; 109(Suppl 6): A30-1. Available from:
https://heart.bmj.com/content/heartjnl/109/Suppl_6/A30.full.pdf
3. McGovern L, Siontis G, Frenk A, Melvin T, McGauran G, Geertsma R, Schnell-Inderst P, Fraser AG, Windecker S, Byrne R. 24 Systematic review of strength of evidence supporting the approval and clinical use of high-risk medical devices in cardiovascular medicine: an update from the CORE-MD consortium. Heart [Internet]. 2022 Oct 06 [cited 2024 Oct 02] 108(Suppl 3):A1–A58. Available from:
doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-ICS.24
4. Regulatory science for high-risk medical devices in the EU [Internet]. European Union;2022 [cited 2024 Oct 02]. Available from:
Booklet-final-conference-001_website-version.pdf (core-md.eu)
5. Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices (CORE-MD) [Internet]. European Union. Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices;2022 [Cited 2024 Oct 04]. Available from:
https://www.escardio.org/The-ESC/Press-Office/Press-releases/EU-assessment-of-high-risk-medical-devices-faces-in-depth-review
6. Coordinating research and evidence for medical device [Internet]. European Union: CORE-MD; 2022 [cited 2024 Oct 04]. Available from:
https://cgsm.org/
7. Fraser AG, Nelissen RG, Kjærsgaard-Andersen P, Szymański P, Melvin T, Piscoi P. Improved clinical investigation and evaluation of high-risk medical devices: the rationale and objectives of CORE–MD (Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices). EFORT open reviews [Internet]. 2021 Oct 19 [cited 2024 Oct 12]; 6(10):839-49. Available from:
doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210081
8. Fraser AG, Byrne RA, Kautzner J, Butchart EG, Szymański P, Leggeri I, de Boer RA, Caiani EG, Van de Werf F, Vardas PE, Badimon L. Implementing the new European Regulations on medical devices-clinical responsibilities for evidence-based practice: a report from the Regulatory Affairs Committee of the European Society of Cardiology [Internet]. European heart journal; 2020 Jul 14 [Cited 2024 Oct 13]; 41(27):2589-96. Available from:
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa382
9. Niemiec E. Will the EU Medical Device Regulation help to improve the safety and performance of medical AI devices? [Internet]. Digital Health. 2022 Mar [cited 2024 Oct 18]; 8:20552076221089079. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221089079
10. Minssen T, Gerke S, Aboy M, Price N, Cohen G. Regulatory responses to medical machine learning. Journal of Law and the Biosciences [Internet]. 2020 Jan [cited 2024 Oct 18]; 7(1): lsaa 002. Available from:
doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa002
11. Zenner HP, Božić M. Clinical evaluation of medical devices in Europe. Personalized Medicine in Healthcare Systems: Legal, Medical and Economic Implications. Europeanization and Globalization [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Oct 18]; 21-32. Available from:
doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16465-2_2
12. Anderson ML, Chiswell K, Peterson ED, Tasneem A, Topping J, Califf RM. Compliance with results reporting at Clinical Trials. gov. New England Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2015 Mar 12 [cited 2024 Oct 20]; 372(11):1031-9. Available from: doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1409364
13. Chang L, Dhruva SS, Chu J, Bero LA, Redberg RF. Selective reporting in trials of high-risk cardiovascular devices: cross sectional comparison between premarket approval summaries and published reports. Bmj [Internet]. 2015 Jun 10 [cited 2024 Oct 21];350. Available from:
https://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h2613
14. Quesada O, Yang E, Redberg RF. Availability and dissemination of results from us food and drug administration–mandated post approval studies for medical devices. JAMA Internal Medicine [Internet]. 2016 Aug 01 [Cited 2024 Oct 22] ;176(8):1221-3. Available from:
https://sci-hub.se/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2955
15. Fraser AG, Butchart EG, Szymański P, Caiani EG, Crosby S, Kearney P, Van de Werf F. The need for transparency of clinical evidence for medical devices in Europe. The Lancet [Internet]. 2018 Aug 11 [cited 2024 Oct 22]; 392(10146):521-30. Available from:
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31270-4
16. The European medical technology industry. Medtech Europe [Internet]. medtecheurope.org;2022 [Cited 2024 Oct 22] Available from:
https://www.medtecheurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/the-european-medical-technology-industry-in-figures-2022.pdf
17. Windecker S, Gilard M, Achenbach S, Cribier A, Delgado V, Deych N, Drossart I, Eltchaninoff H, Fraser AG, Goncalves A, Hindricks G. Device innovation in cardiovascular medicine: a report from the European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular Round Table. European Heart Journal [Internet]. 2024 Apr 01 [cited 2024 Oct 23] ;45(13):1104-15. Available from:
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae069
18. Byrne RA, Serruys PW, Baumbach A, Escaned J, Fajadet J, James S, Joner M, Oktay S, Jüni P, Kastrati A, Sianos G. Report of a European Society of Cardiology-European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions task force on the evaluation of coronary stents in Europe: executive summary. European heart journal [Internet]. 2015 Oct 07 [Cited 2024 Oct 23] ;36(38):2608-20. Available from:
Doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv203
19. Byrne RA, Stefanini GG, Capodanno D, Onuma Y, Baumbach A, Escaned J, Haude M, James S, Joner M, Jüni P, Kastrati A. Report of an ESC-EAPCI Task Force on the evaluation and use of bioresorbable scaffolds for percutaneous coronary intervention: executive summary. European heart journal [Internet]. 2018 May 07 [cited 2024 Oct 25];39(18):1591-601. Available from:
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx488
20. Heinemann L, Freckmann G, Koschinsky T. Considerations for an institution for evaluation of diabetes technology devices to improve their quality in the European Union. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology [Internet]. 2013 Mar [cited 2024 Oct 28];7(2):542-7. Available from:
doi: 10.1177/193229681300700230
21. Vasey B, Nagendran M, Campbell B, Clifton DA, Collins GS, Denaxas S, Denniston AK, Faes L, Geerts B, Ibrahim M, Liu X. Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI. Bmj [Internet]. 2022 May 18 [cited 2024 Oct 29];377. Available from:
doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-070904

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The International Journal of Drug Regulatory affairs require a formal written transfer of copyright from the author(s) for each article published. We therefore ask you to complete and return this form, retaining a copy for your records. Your cooperation is essential and appreciated. Any delay will result in a delay in publication.
I/we have read and agree with the terms and conditions stated Page 2 of this agreement and I/we hereby confirm the transfer of all copyrights in and relating to the above-named manuscript, in all forms and media, now or hereafter known, to the International Journal of Drug Regulatory affairs, effective from the date stated below. I/we acknowledge that the IJDRA is relying on this agreement in publishing the above-named manuscript. However, this agreement will be null and void if the manuscript is not published in the IJDRA.
Download link for COPYRIGHT FORM





